Theory: Piles
How Aoki-Velloso's and Décourt-Quaresma's semi-empirical methods estimate a pile's bearing capacity from the N values of an SPT boring, and how the allowable load follows.
Bearing capacity
An axially loaded pile passes its load to the soil through friction along its shaft and the resistance under its tip. At failure, its capacity is the sum of the two.
In Brazil, rp and rl usually come from correlations with the SPT's N, a test run on almost every site. The methods are semi-empirical: calibrated on load tests of certain pile types and soils, they should be used within that context.
Aoki-Velloso
Aoki and Velloso (1975) started from the cone penetration test (CPT), taking the pile's tip as a full-scale cone. The cone's tip resistance relates to N through K, and its sleeve friction to its tip resistance through α; the factors F1 and F2 account for the difference in scale and the way the pile is built.
| Soil | K (MPa) | α (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Sand | 1.00 | 1.4 |
| Silty sand | 0.80 | 2.0 |
| Silty clayey sand | 0.70 | 2.4 |
| Clayey sand | 0.60 | 3.0 |
| Clayey silty sand | 0.50 | 2.8 |
| Silt | 0.40 | 3.0 |
| Sandy silt | 0.55 | 2.2 |
| Sandy clayey silt | 0.45 | 2.8 |
| Clayey silt | 0.23 | 3.4 |
| Clayey sandy silt | 0.25 | 3.0 |
| Clay | 0.20 | 6.0 |
| Sandy clay | 0.35 | 2.4 |
| Sandy silty clay | 0.30 | 2.8 |
| Silty clay | 0.22 | 4.0 |
| Silty sandy clay | 0.33 | 3.0 |
| Pile | F1 | F2 |
|---|---|---|
| Franki | 2.50 | 5.00 |
| Precast concrete | 1 + D/0.80 | 2F1 |
| Steel | 1.75 | 3.50 |
| Bored | 3.00 | 6.00 |
| CFA and root | 2.00 | 4.00 |
Décourt-Quaresma
Décourt and Quaresma (1978) related N directly to the resistances of precast concrete piles. At the tip, Np is the mean of the N at the tip and those just above and below; along the shaft, Nl is the mean along it, without those used at the tip, each N between 3 and 50.
| Soil at the tip | C (kPa) |
|---|---|
| Clays | 120 |
| Clayey silts (residual soil) | 200 |
| Sandy silts (residual soil) | 250 |
| Sands | 400 |
| Pile | α clay / silt / sand | β clay / silt / sand |
|---|---|---|
| Driven | 1.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 | 1.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 |
| Bored | 0.85 / 0.60 / 0.50 | 0.80 / 0.65 / 0.50 |
| CFA | 0.30 / 0.30 / 0.30 | 1.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 |
| Root | 0.85 / 0.60 / 0.50 | 1.50 / 1.50 / 1.50 |
Allowable load
- In bored piles, NBR 6122 holds the tip's share to 20% of the allowable load, as the base is hard to clean: the shaft must carry the rest.
- The two methods often differ, sometimes widely; comparing them, and with load tests from the region, gives a measure of the uncertainty.
- The pile's allowable load also depends on its settlement and the structural strength of its shaft, which this app doesn't check.
References
- Aoki, N.; Velloso, D. A. An approximate method to estimate the bearing capacity of piles. In: Panamerican Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 5., Buenos Aires, 1975. v. 1, p. 367–376.
- Décourt, L.; Quaresma, A. R. Capacidade de carga de estacas a partir de valores de SPT. In: Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia de Fundações, 6., Rio de Janeiro, 1978. v. 1, p. 45–53.
- Décourt, L. et al. Análise e projeto de fundações profundas. In: Hachich, W. et al. (ed.). Fundações: teoria e prática. São Paulo: Pini, 1996.
- Cintra, J. C. A.; Aoki, N. Fundações por estacas: projeto geotécnico. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2010.
- ABNT. NBR 6122: Projeto e execução de fundações. Rio de Janeiro, 2019.